For years, now, females have been losing jobs after daring to express the view that biology is real and crucial.

Companies and public bodies, recorded by the demands of extremist trans activists, have exacted vicious punishments on those expressing perfectly mainstream - and legal - views on sex and gender.

Inevitably, tribunals have followed a variety of these cases. During these, we've heard terrible information of females dealt with abominably by companies in thrall to campaigners who prompted and imposed the illegal adoption of self-ID policies when it came to single-sex spaces.

We've become aware of women bullied and avoided for questioning the right of those born male to self-identify into females's spaces, from altering rooms to domestic violence refuges.

Equally inevitably, those women efficient in battling back have actually been winning legal actions.

But even a rock strong case does not make it simple to retaliate. Good lawyers are pricey and the procedure is draining pipes, both physically and mentally.

For every single female who has actually thrived in court, there are a lot more for whom launching a legal case seemed difficult.

The establishment by the novelist and philanthropist JK Rowling of a fund to support females's legal security of their rights instantly gets rid of any financial barriers to action for those with viable cases.

Author JK Rowling has established a fund to support ladies's legal protection of their rights

The intervention of Ms Rowling should, today, be concentrating minds in personnels departments throughout the country.

Since the Supreme Court ruled, last month, that sex, in law, was a matter of biology rather than paperwork, a variety of organisations - in both the general public and economic sectors - have released declarations revealing their choices to "think about" the ramifications for their policies.

This extensive and negligent complacency stands to cost business - and taxpayer-funded bodies - dear. The realities are easy. If a service is provided on a single sex basis that means biological sex, not individual identity.

The law is the law and no additional factor to consider is needed in order for employers to meet their responsibilities under it.

A variety of previous legal actions after women were unfairly dismissed or bullied out of tasks for declining to concur with the mantra "trans women are females" were possible thanks to the support of online crowd-funding projects. Ms Rowling often promoted - and contributed to - such fundraisers.

Now, she's a one-woman crowd-funder, prepared to back the cases of every woman wronged at work for speaking the reality about sex.

The JK Rowling Women's Fund will change the battleground when it comes to females victimized for their genuine, reality-based views.

At the heart of commercial tribunals there may be susceptible people playing for high stakes however the human expense means absolutely nothing to the insurance companies financing companies' costs. For them, it's all about the bottom line and the possibility that every lady with a case now has access to the very best lawyers in business will, I presume, motivate many to prompt settlement rather than the embarrassment, and unavoidable cost, of more doomed defences.

If one required evidence that females's rights are in requirement of the fiercest defense, it came in the action to the launch of Ms Rowling's fund.

With delicious pathos, one activist legal representative stated online that the Harry Potter developer had "emerged from the shadows" as the funder of what he referred to as the "anti feminist biology is destiny motion".

Ms Rowling has never remained in the shadows when it comes to her views on women's rights, has she?

Other reactions were, predictably, more violent in tone.

The ongoing tribunal including nurse Sandie Peggie, claiming discrimination and harassment against NHS Fife and trans-identifying physician Beth Upton, brought the issue of the method so called "gender important" ladies had actually been dealt with at work to broad attention. This is a case that "cut through" with the public and forced some political leaders to address an issue they chose to prevent.

Scottish Labour's leader Anas Sarwar and his deputy, Jackie Baillie, revealed their assistance for Ms Peggie and declared their belief in the importance of biological sex.